Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
That's great advice Travis! Also I hear people say “Know your limits, but always push them.”
You caught me assuming again Travis! That's good.Stowe DOES give that “image” of “exclusivity” and that is just the problem. People who run the Marketing Depts for these mountain “resorts” are college grads who have the wrong idea altogether. They are not even close to being on teh right track or being in touch with their clientele.I bet (again assuming, but from experience) these people aren't even skiers and almost surely are not boarders. I know winter mountain activities, i.e. skiing, has always been costly, but it is not Disney World and it is not a Mercedez Benz. These are not “once in a lifetime” opportunities and nor should they be viewed as such. They view their “product” as a high end item. They look for ways to “maximize” the “perception of value” in theirYou caught me assuming again Travis! That's good.Stowe DOES give that “image” of “exclusivity” and that is just the problem. People who run the Marketing Depts for these mountain “resorts” are college grads who have the wrong idea altogether. They are not even close to being on teh right track or being in touch with their clientele.I bet (again assuming, but from experience) these people aren't even skiers and almost surely are not boarders. I know winter mountain activities, i.e. skiing, has always been costly, but it is not Disney World and it is not a Mercedez Benz. These are not “once in a lifetime” opportunities and nor should they be viewed as such. They view their “product” as a high end item. They look for ways to “maximize” the “perception of value” in their “brand”. The more “Corporate” they are the worse. Yes I am talking about Vail Resorts, Intrawest, Powder Corp, American Skiing Company, etc… as well as all the “Investment Groups”… actually, especially the investment groups. Those people are clueless!Knock, knock… HELLO?wikipedia wrote:Powdr Corporation has been criticized for its refusal to honor lifetime season passes upon its purchase of Killington Resort and increasing pass prices at Mt. Bachelor. In July of 2010, “A federal judge dismissed a class action lawsuit against Killington Resort over so-called 'lifetime' ski passes. Judge Christina Reiss found that the resort owner was under no legal obligation to honor the investor season passes when it purchased Killington Resort in 2007. She also noted that in its purchase agreement with American Skiing Co., SP Land agreed to honor 37 'lifetime' passes, which did not include the names of the plaintiffs or the names of any class members. (A number of those lifetime passes were issued over the years to former employees). She said the investor pass certificates stated very clearly that the passes were valid 'so long as the Sherburne Corp., and that became Killington Ltd., continued to operate the lifts there' and that neither corporation exists today.I honestly think most snowboarders would be appalled at the attitudes, culture, and workings that go on behind the scenes at major mountain resorts. Maybe next time I go to the mountain and they ask me for $75 for a lift ticket I will write them a reality check for it.Wow, Stowe is on a different planet! But at least they are popular and book up solid every season. Here at Mt Bachelor, they have SO MANY days where virtually no one is at the mountain (especially non-powder days) and the management is probably scratching their heads wondering why no one is coming. Hey guys, it's not because you didn't advertise enough; people know you are there. It's not because you don't have that new, high-tech lift; you have enough uphill transport. It's not even because of lack of snow' we get PLENTY!It's because PEOPLE CAN'T AFFORD IT!By people I mean the 100,000+ locals in the area. Here is a tip to the management of all ski mountains…No one is going to not come back because they got too good a deal. And if people REALLY WANT TO spens too muWow, Stowe is on a different planet! But at least they are popular and book up solid every season. Here at Mt Bachelor, they have SO MANY days where virtually no one is at the mountain (especially non-powder days) and the management is probably scratching their heads wondering why no one is coming. Hey guys, it's not because you didn't advertise enough; people know you are there. It's not because you don't have that new, high-tech lift; you have enough uphill transport. It's not even because of lack of snow' we get PLENTY!It's because PEOPLE CAN'T AFFORD IT!By people I mean the 100,000+ locals in the area. Here is a tip to the management of all ski mountains…No one is going to not come back because they got too good a deal. And if people REALLY WANT TO spens too much money for stuff (yes I understand there are some out there, God Bless 'Em) then sell them $7 beers, $13 burgers, and overpriced crap from the gift shop.Should I keep going?Nope, no split board for me. From what I can gather, skiers who ski twin-tip skis tend to choose lengths that are shorter than traditional skis, even though the twins already have a shorter contact length (running surface). I think the reason might be that people who ski twins are more often parkers and freestylers. Dunno though, lots of diversity out there.
Nice! Thanks for checking back in with us. Can't wait to see how you like it out on the mountain. 😎
K2 World Wide Weapon seems like a good jib board. I haven't tried it yet. Yeah, the Taipan is a nice board!
September 1, 2011 at 6:24 pm in reply to: Vid-Review: Salomon Rythem Snowboard Bindings 2012 Review #3752Aren't they called Salomon Rhythm?
Well, there are a good variety of boards out there, but from looking at your specs (which was really cool of you to lay out like that) I have come up with three suggestions of my own for you.- Ride Manic Wide Snowboard 160- Rome Crail Wide Snowboard 158- Rossignol Taipan Amptek Midwide Snowboard 158As for the bindings, the Burton Cartels are always a good choice. Great proven performance and reliability.Remember though, of you choose a non-Burton board, get the Cartels with the 4-hole pattern, not the 3-hole or channel. 😎
That board looks incredible. I love seeing such good deals too! NICE 😎
I am really glad to help you Eves. Let us know how you like the board once it comes in and you get to ride it, ok?=======================================================[html]
[/html][iurl=http://www.frostyrider.com/shops/frostys_shop.htm?gear=rome vinyl]Compare pricing on Rome Vinyl Snowboards.[/iurl]Welcome Eves,I studied this a bit for ya and I think that the 152 will be a great board for you. The little added width will be really nice for added surface area providing floatation in the powder and soft snow, but without the lumbering length of the 155. Go for it!
I would have a board shop take a look and see what they say. I would definitely get it checked out!
Word up! What kind of listening device do you use? I just use my G1 phone (getting a g2 soon) with stereo bluetooth headphones. 😎
I like Reggae or Techno depending on my mood — and some specific artists like Pennywise, Sublime, Godsmack, Megadeth. Sometimes Motown even. 😎
Welcome norcal412,Fist I must say that I really enjoy answering this question because your post is so wonderfully composed and laid out. Have you considered a career in journalism or writing? OK now I am getting off topic, so anywhooo…OK, I always say this but, width is more important than length. I believe this is especially true in your case due to your weight, boot size, and style of rising (fast and hard carving) — the “wide” width is going to invoke fatigue way too early and when it does you are not going to be able to hold up the necessary angles for carving grip. Then you will wipe out a lot. MY best advise to you is to get a board that is under 25cm wide.Now to length of board. Not as critical, but I would say around 157 to 158cm. If you go beyond that either way, no big deal. More or less, the longer board will give you more flWelcome norcal412,Fist I must say that I really enjoy answering this question because your post is so wonderfully composed and laid out. Have you considered a career in journalism or writing? OK now I am getting off topic, so anywhooo…OK, I always say this but, width is more important than length. I believe this is especially true in your case due to your weight, boot size, and style of rising (fast and hard carving) — the “wide” width is going to invoke fatigue way too early and when it does you are not going to be able to hold up the necessary angles for carving grip. Then you will wipe out a lot. MY best advise to you is to get a board that is under 25cm wide.Now to length of board. Not as critical, but I would say around 157 to 158cm. If you go beyond that either way, no big deal. More or less, the longer board will give you more floatibility and the shorter more spinibility. Now when you go with the longer board, it may FEEL too long at first. But actually it will be your fighting against the flow, which is natural human instinct. But once you stop fighting that longer edge and learn to subtly manipulate it using the wonderful control mechanisms of torsional flex, edge weighting/unweighting, turn size and shape, fore/aft pressuring, etc. you will then be riding WITH the flow and thus much more efficiently — washing out less, handling higher speeds and steeper runs, blazing through crud and chop as if it was fresh pow.Of all the control mechanisms mentioned above, the most important to you is torsional flex. Once you master it and what it can do for control of your board, the others will fall into the skill quiver more naturally.The GNU Rider's Choice is a fine board indeed. Lots of new technology and nice graphics, but good luck finding a GNU under 25cm width. This has been a problem with GNU I have had for a LONG time now. To put out such high quality products and then not provide the sizing variety for people is just wrong. GNU is not the only brand guilty of this. It has become a bit of a challenge challenge to find ANY brand board under 25cm in a 156 – 161 length range. Now I COULD be wrong, but I am not. I know the real reason companies make these models so damn wide and it is not because it is what the consumer is demanding for best performance. It is because, although they are “alternative” and “progressive” compared to most industry out there, they are still corporate and so much of the time the “penny for pound” mentality wins out. Their attitude basically is, “Fit as many different riders into the same model as possible, therefore increasing the quantity of potential customers for that particular model”. Making board$ wider increases that number for them, but screws guys with boot size <10 US. I am going to cut this rant short for lack of time right now, but it really grinds my gears.Now, although I disagree with a few of their business philosophies, I give props to Burton for providing a fine variety of snowboards. Here is a list of a few Burton Snowboards that are less than 25 cm waist width:Burton Custom X Snowboard 156 (24.8w)Burton Aftermath Squeezebox Snowboard 158 (24.9w)Burton Econico Snowboard 156 (24.8w)Burton Farm Snowboard 157 (25w)Burton Jeremy Jones Snowboard 159 (24.7w)Burton Jussi Snowboard 156 (24.8w)Burton Supermodel X Snowboard 156 (24.9w)Burton T6 Snowboard 159 (24.6w)Notice that most of these boards are the ones developed by Professional Snowboarders, not desk jockeys. Yes, a notable variety of boards sized for you, now you have a choice of the proprietary 3-hole or the proprietary channel binding systems. Why not industry standard 4-hole binding system you ask? Well, maybe it is so you must use B$ boards with B$ binders (for the most part, I actually use Flow bindings on my Burton Custom) or maybe Big Brother Jake knows what's best for you and that's final. You really think these professional rides are begging for these goofy systems? I think they just want what works. (Frosty now suppressing secondary rant!)Other companies make boards sized right too, they are just hard to find. Do some homework, ask around. Follow your common sense and find something you are confident in. Then ROCK ON!!!Later,FR – 8 -
AuthorPosts